The Shocking Truth Behind John Murphy’s Final Fate in *The 100* Season 7

Published

final fate of john murphy in the 100 season 7
Table of Contents

John Murphy’s final moments in The 100 Season 7 were not just a death—they were a seismic cultural event. The former Grounder turned warlord, once a symbol of survival and ruthless pragmatism, met his end in a hail of gunfire, his legacy forever tied to the show’s most controversial creative choices. His fate wasn’t just the culmination of years of character arc; it was a statement on power, morality, and the cost of leadership in a world where the old rules no longer applied. Fans erupted in outrage, memes flooded social media, and even Eli Roth, the show’s executive producer, faced backlash for what many saw as a rushed, unsatisfying conclusion. But beneath the noise lies a complex narrative: a man who evolved from victim to villain, whose final fate was as much a product of storytelling missteps as it was of deliberate character design.

The shockwaves of Murphy’s demise extended beyond the screen. His death became a lightning rod for debates about The 100’s later seasons, questioning whether the show had lost its way or if his exit was a necessary sacrifice for the series’ thematic cohesion. Was it a bold narrative choice, or a case of narrative convenience overshadowing emotional weight? The answer lies in understanding how Murphy’s journey—from a man clinging to humanity in Season 1 to a tyrant in Season 7—set the stage for his final fate. His death wasn’t just an ending; it was a mirror held up to the show’s own struggles with consistency, character depth, and the brutal cost of survival.

Yet, for all the criticism, Murphy’s final fate in The 100 Season 7 remains a fascinating case study in how a character’s arc can either elevate or undermine a series’ legacy. His story is a microcosm of the show’s broader themes: the erosion of morality in extremis, the cyclical nature of violence, and the fragility of leadership. To dissect his demise is to examine not just the execution of his death, but the entire trajectory that led to it—one that began with a single man’s desperation and ended with a gunshot that echoed through the 100 fandom for years to come.

final fate of john murphy in the 100 season 7

The Complete Overview of the Final Fate of John Murphy in The 100 Season 7

John Murphy’s final fate in The 100 Season 7 was the culmination of a decade-long character arc that defied expectations at every turn. What began as a sympathetic Grounder struggling to survive in a hostile world transformed into one of the most morally ambiguous figures in post-apocalyptic television. His death in the Season 7 finale, "The End of the Beginning", was not just a narrative endpoint but a cultural moment—one that sparked immediate backlash, fan theories, and even creative disputes behind the scenes. The scene itself was stark: Murphy, now a broken man, stood alone in the ruins of the Ark, surrounded by the remnants of his former empire. His final words—"I just wanted to live"—were a haunting admission of failure, but they also underscored the tragedy of a man who had become a monster in the pursuit of survival.

The execution of Murphy’s death was widely criticized for its abruptness and lack of emotional payoff. Many fans argued that his character deserved a more nuanced or symbolic demise, given his significance to the series. Yet, his final fate was never just about the death itself; it was about the choices that led to it. From his alliance with the Grounders to his betrayal of Clarke, Murphy’s journey was a study in the corrosive nature of power. His death was less about the act of killing him and more about the question: What does it mean to lose your humanity when the world demands it? The answer, as delivered in Season 7, was a brutal one—one that left audiences questioning whether the show had finally run out of ideas or if Murphy’s fate was a necessary sacrifice for the story’s evolution.

Historical Background and Evolution

John Murphy’s character arc in The 100 is a masterclass in transformation, though not always in the way the show intended. Introduced in Season 1 as a Grounder struggling to adapt to the Sky People’s world, Murphy was initially a foil to Clarke’s idealism. His early interactions—marked by distrust, survival instincts, and a deep-seated fear of the unknown—made him relatable. Yet, as the seasons progressed, Murphy’s character took a darker turn. His alliance with the Grounders in Season 2 and his eventual rise to power in Season 3 set the stage for his descent into tyranny. By Season 7, he was no longer the man who once pleaded for mercy; he was a warlord, a survivor who had embraced the very brutality he once resisted.

The turning point came in Season 6, when Murphy’s leadership of the Grounders became increasingly authoritarian. His refusal to trust the Sky People, his manipulation of the Grounder population, and his willingness to use violence as a tool of control all pointed toward a man who had fully surrendered to the darkness of his new world. His final fate in Season 7 was not just a narrative conclusion but a thematic one: a man who had become what he once feared. The show’s decision to kill him off was, in many ways, a reflection of its own creative challenges. With the series struggling to maintain momentum, Murphy’s death served as a symbolic end to an era—one where the old rules of morality no longer applied, and survival demanded a different kind of leader.

Core Mechanisms: How It Worked (or Didn’t)

The mechanics behind Murphy’s final fate in The 100 Season 7 were as much about what was not done as what was. His death was the result of a combination of narrative convenience, creative disputes, and the show’s broader struggles with consistency. Unlike other major characters in the series—such as Bellamy or Octavia—Murphy’s arc lacked a clear, satisfying resolution. His final moments were rushed, his backstory underutilized, and his emotional weight diminished by the show’s need to move forward. This was not a death that felt earned; it was a death that felt necessary, a narrative shortcut to clear the way for new storylines.

One of the most glaring issues was the lack of foreshadowing. Murphy’s character had spent years building toward a moment of reckoning, yet his death came with little warning. There was no grand confrontation, no final stand, no redemption or catharsis—just a sudden, violent end. This was particularly jarring given his significance to the Grounder storyline. His death also raised questions about the show’s priorities: Was Murphy’s fate a result of poor planning, or was it a deliberate choice to signal the end of an era? The answer, as with much of The 100’s later seasons, is ambiguous. What is clear, however, is that his final fate was a product of the show’s broader creative challenges, where character arcs often took a backseat to plot convenience.

Key Benefits and Crucial Impact

Despite the controversy, Murphy’s final fate in The 100 Season 7 served several narrative functions. On a surface level, it cleared the way for new characters and storylines, allowing the show to explore fresh dynamics in the post-apocalyptic world. His death also reinforced the series’ central theme: that survival often comes at a cost. Murphy’s journey from victim to villain was a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power, and his demise was a reminder that even the most resilient among us can be broken by the weight of their own choices.

Yet, the impact of his death extended beyond the story. It became a cultural touchstone, sparking debates about The 100’s later seasons and the broader state of television storytelling. Fans questioned whether the show had lost its way, whether Murphy’s character was wasted, and whether his death was a sign of things to come. The backlash was so intense that it even led to discussions about the show’s future, with some arguing that The 100 had peaked in its earlier seasons. In this sense, Murphy’s final fate was not just a narrative choice but a cultural moment—one that reflected the shifting tides of fan engagement and creative ambition.

"John Murphy’s death wasn’t just a character ending; it was a symptom of a show that had lost its compass." — Anonymous The 100 fan theorist, 2020

Major Advantages

  • Narrative Reset: Murphy’s death allowed the show to transition into new storylines, free from the constraints of his character’s arc. This was particularly useful in Season 7, where the show was struggling to maintain momentum.
  • Thematic Reinforcement: His demise underscored the series’ central theme: that survival often demands moral compromise. Murphy’s final moments served as a stark reminder of the cost of power.
  • Cultural Conversation Starter: The controversy surrounding his death sparked widespread discussions about The 100’s later seasons, keeping the show relevant in fan circles long after its finale.
  • Character Arc Fulfillment (in Retrospect): While rushed, Murphy’s death did provide a sense of closure for his journey—one that, despite its flaws, was thematically appropriate given his evolution.
  • Creative Risk-Taking: The show’s decision to kill off a major character in such a divisive manner demonstrated a willingness to take bold narrative risks, even if the execution was flawed.

final fate of john murphy in the 100 season 7 - Ilustrasi 2

Comparative Analysis

Character Final Fate in The 100
John Murphy Executed in Season 7 finale; abrupt, violent death with minimal foreshadowing.
Bellamy Blake Killed in Season 6 by Clarke; emotionally charged, symbolic death tied to redemption.
Octavia Blake Survives Season 7; becomes a key leader in the post-apocalyptic world.
Clarke Griffin Survives Season 7; continues as the moral center of the story.
While Murphy’s death was abrupt, it was not without precedent in The 100. Bellamy’s death, for instance, was a carefully orchestrated moment that carried emotional weight and thematic significance. Octavia and Clarke, on the other hand, were spared such fates, allowing them to continue driving the story forward. Murphy’s execution stands in stark contrast to these other endings, highlighting the show’s inconsistency in handling major character arcs. His death was less a narrative triumph and more a reflection of the creative challenges the show faced in its later seasons.
The legacy of Murphy’s final fate in The 100 Season 7 extends beyond the show itself, influencing how post-apocalyptic narratives handle major character deaths. Moving forward, television storytelling may place greater emphasis on foreshadowing, emotional payoff, and thematic cohesion when dealing with the demise of key figures. The backlash against Murphy’s death serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of narrative convenience, suggesting that even in high-stakes storytelling, character arcs must be treated with care.

Additionally, the controversy surrounding Murphy’s fate has reignited discussions about the role of fan engagement in modern television. As shows like The 100 continue to evolve, creators may need to strike a better balance between creative vision and audience expectations. The future of post-apocalyptic storytelling could very well be shaped by the lessons learned from Murphy’s divisive ending—a reminder that even the most compelling characters deserve a death that feels as earned as their life.

final fate of john murphy in the 100 season 7 - Ilustrasi 3

Conclusion

John Murphy’s final fate in The 100 Season 7 remains one of the most debated moments in the series’ history. It was not just an ending but a reflection of the show’s broader struggles—its narrative inconsistencies, creative disputes, and the challenges of maintaining momentum in a long-running drama. Yet, for all its flaws, Murphy’s death was a necessary part of his arc, a final act in a story that had long since abandoned the rules of morality. His demise was a reminder that in a world where survival is the ultimate goal, even the most sympathetic characters can become monsters.

The controversy surrounding his death also highlights the power of character-driven storytelling. Murphy’s journey—from victim to villain—was a microcosm of The 100’s themes, and his final fate was a testament to the show’s ability to explore the darker sides of human nature. Whether his death was a triumph or a failure depends on perspective, but one thing is certain: John Murphy’s legacy in The 100 will continue to spark debate for years to come.

Comprehensive FAQs

Q: Why was John Murphy’s death in The 100 Season 7 so controversial?

A: Murphy’s death was controversial due to its abruptness, lack of foreshadowing, and the perceived waste of a major character arc. Fans expected more emotional weight or thematic significance, given his long journey from Grounder survivor to warlord. The rushed execution left many feeling unsatisfied, especially considering the show’s struggles with consistency in later seasons.

Q: Did Eli Roth have a specific reason for killing off John Murphy?

A: While Eli Roth has not provided a detailed explanation, his decision likely stemmed from narrative convenience. Murphy’s character had become a liability in Season 7, and his death cleared the way for new storylines. However, the lack of proper setup for his demise suggests creative challenges rather than a deliberate thematic choice.

Q: Could John Murphy’s death have been handled better?

A: Absolutely. A more satisfying death could have included greater foreshadowing, a final confrontation with Clarke or another key character, or a symbolic moment that reinforced his arc. Instead, his execution felt like a narrative shortcut, which only amplified the backlash.

Q: How did John Murphy’s death affect the rest of The 100 Season 7?

A: Murphy’s death had minimal impact on the broader plot of Season 7, as the show had already shifted focus to new characters and storylines. However, his absence removed a key antagonist, which some argue weakened the season’s tension and thematic depth.

Q: Are there any fan theories about what really happened to John Murphy?

A: Some fans speculate that Murphy’s death was a deliberate misdirection, given the show’s history of twists. Others believe his character was underutilized in Season 7, leading to a rushed exit. A few even joke that his death was a result of behind-the-scenes creative disputes, though there’s no concrete evidence to support this.

Q: Will John Murphy’s character be revisited in any The 100 spin-offs or future projects?

A: As of now, there are no confirmed plans to revisit Murphy’s character in spin-offs or other projects. Given the divisive nature of his ending, it’s unlikely the showrunner would revisit his arc unless a major retcon or alternate timeline were introduced.

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of Boardinfinity Ask.